Comments on: Religious Hate Bill Defeat http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/religious-hate-bill-defeat/ Toujours Le Meme Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:23:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Wolfie http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/religious-hate-bill-defeat/#comment-2023 Wolfie Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:53:05 +0000 http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/197/#comment-2023 Are you suggesting a justification on cue? Surely not here? Are you suggesting a justification on cue? Surely not here?

]]> By: Snowball http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/religious-hate-bill-defeat/#comment-2020 Snowball Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:56:30 +0000 http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/197/#comment-2020 Defeated? Only for the moment Mister Grady Only for the moment. <i>Watch this cartoon space</i> Defeated?

Only for the moment Mister Grady

Only for the moment.

Watch this cartoon space

]]> By: Wolfie http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/religious-hate-bill-defeat/#comment-2016 Wolfie Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:08:51 +0000 http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/197/#comment-2016 My thoughts entirely. So then why do this at all? I suspect that this is a manoeuvre to "appear to be doing something" when of course you aren't doing anything at all. It is my suspicion that Her Majesty's Government may be preparing to form new allegiances and this is a signal. Interesting days ahead. Not the first time they have "played both sides". My thoughts entirely. So then why do this at all? I suspect that this is a manoeuvre to “appear to be doing something” when of course you aren’t doing anything at all. It is my suspicion that Her Majesty’s Government may be preparing to form new allegiances and this is a signal. Interesting days ahead. Not the first time they have “played both sides”.

]]> By: Stef http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/religious-hate-bill-defeat/#comment-2015 Stef Sat, 04 Feb 2006 15:26:57 +0000 http://blog.twowolves.co.uk/2006/02/01/197/#comment-2015 One thought that has crossed my mind is that, given the lengths the government normally goes to to get its MPs to attend and vote on contentious legislation it was awfully lax this time. Twenty odd Mps were sent up to canvas a by election and Blair himself didn't even vote. The media has explained this away as being some kind of balls up. A possible alternate explanation is that the legilslation was never meant to be passed One thought that has crossed my mind is that, given the lengths the government normally goes to to get its MPs to attend and vote on contentious legislation it was awfully lax this time.

Twenty odd Mps were sent up to canvas a by election and Blair himself didn’t even vote. The media has explained this away as being some kind of balls up. A possible alternate explanation is that the legilslation was never meant to be passed

]]>